Abstract
BackgroundRecent studies analysing the trends in antipsychotic (AP) prescriptions for children and adolescents have raised concerns regarding the influence of socioeconomic status. Previous findings have also shown variable prescription rates for first-generation (FG) and second-generation (SG) APs.MethodOur objectives were to assess the proportion of patients from low-income families receiving APs and the most commonly prescribed APs in France. We conducted a descriptive analysis of AP drugs dispensed during a 1-year period (July 1, 2013–June 30, 2014) in a northwestern region of France with 941,857 subjects less than 18 years old. All data were extracted from an exhaustive, individual and anonymous social security database. We obtained each subject’s socioeconomic status (by identifying their affiliation with a specific social security program) and also collected sociodemographic data, drug type, prescribing and dispensing dates and amount, and prescriber type (e.g., hospital physician, general practitioner, psychiatrist, paediatrician).ResultsThere were two main novel findings. First, we found that the proportion of patients with AP prescriptions was nearly ten times higher in low-income families than in the general population: 35.9% of CMU-C patients compared to 3.7% in all of Pays de la Loire (X2 = 7875.1, p < 0.001). Additionally, we found a higher rate of FGAP than SGAP prescriptions (65% vs. 57%).ConclusionsOur study suggests two types of AP misuse that could provide interesting targets for public healthcare interventions.First, our results strongly suggest an over-representation of patients from low-income families. Low-income families primarily resided in areas with low physician density and appeared to receive drugs to treat their conditions more frequently than other individuals. This increased prescription rate is a public health issue, potentially requiring political action. Second, the use of FGAPs did not adhere to the latest recommendations for drug use in this population, and this discrepancy should be addressed with informational campaigns targeted to medical practitioners.
Highlights
Recent studies analysing the trends in antipsychotic (AP) prescriptions for children and adolescents have raised concerns regarding the influence of socioeconomic status
We found that the proportion of patients with AP prescriptions was nearly ten times higher in low-income families than in the general population: 35.9% of Couverture Maladie Universelle Complémentaire (CMU-C) patients compared to 3.7% in all of Pays de la Loire (X2 = 7875.1, p < 0.001)
We found a higher rate of first-generation AP (FGAP) than second-generation AP (SGAP) prescriptions (65% vs. 57%)
Summary
Recent studies analysing the trends in antipsychotic (AP) prescriptions for children and adolescents have raised concerns regarding the influence of socioeconomic status. Previous findings have shown variable prescription rates for first-generation (FG) and second-generation (SG) APs. Antipsychotic (AP) drugs are recommended for the treatment for schizophrenia [1] and bipolar disorders [2] in children and adolescents. The first pertains to the use of first- and secondgeneration APs. Considering the data on their efficacy and side effects, the literature recommends a first-line prescription of a second-generation AP (SGAP) and switching to another SGAP if necessary before considering a first-generation AP (FGAP) [1]. The use of SGAPs is recommended, and longitudinal studies have shown an increase in AP prescriptions in the last two decades with a switch from FGAPs to SGAPs [7,8,9]. Some European studies, including those in France, have found that FGAPs are still much prescribed in this population, whereas in the U.S, the rate of FGAP prescriptions among youth is very low [4, 10]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have