Abstract

IntroductionRecent research focused on the interaction between land cover and the development of allergic and respiratory disease has provided conflicting results and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In particular, green space, which confers an overall positive impact on general health, may be significantly contributing to adverse respiratory health outcomes. This study evaluates associations between surrounding residential land cover (green, grey, agricultural and blue space), including type of forest cover (deciduous, coniferous and mixed), and childhood allergic and respiratory diseases. MethodsData from 8063 children, aged 3–14 years, were obtained from nine European population-based studies participating in the HEALS project. Land-cover exposures within a 500 m buffer centred on each child's residential address were computed using data from the Coordination of Information on the Environment (CORINE) program. The associations of allergic and respiratory symptoms (wheeze, asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema) with land coverage were estimated for each study using logistic regression models, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, maternal education, parental smoking, and parental history of allergy. Finally, the pooled effects across studies were estimated using meta-analyses. ResultsIn the pooled analyses, a 10% increase in green space coverage was significantly associated with a 5.9%–13.0% increase in the odds of wheezing, asthma, and allergic rhinitis, but not eczema. A trend of an inverse relationship between agricultural space and respiratory symptoms was observed, but did not reach statistical significance. In secondary analyses, children living in areas with surrounding coniferous forests had significantly greater odds of reporting wheezing, asthma and allergic rhinitis. ConclusionOur results provide further evidence that exposure to green space is associated with increased respiratory disease in children. Additionally, our findings suggest that coniferous forests might be associated with wheezing, asthma and allergic rhinitis. Additional studies evaluating both the type of green space and its use in relation to respiratory conditions should be conducted in order to clarify the underlying mechanisms behind associated adverse impacts.

Highlights

  • Recent research focused on the interaction between land cover and the development of allergic and respiratory disease has provided conflicting results and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood

  • Contrary to impacts on these other health indicators, allergic and respiratory symptoms can increase with increased nearby green space and are consistent with many, but not all, studies focused on similar associations (Gernes et al, 2019; Lambert et al, 2017; Tischer et al, 2017)

  • In considering the distinction between forest types, we found significant associations between coniferous forests and respiratory health outcomes, the number of children living in proximity to these forest types was relatively small in our study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent research focused on the interaction between land cover and the development of allergic and respiratory disease has provided conflicting results and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Our findings suggest that coniferous forests might be associated with wheezing, asthma and allergic rhinitis Additional studies evaluating both the type of green space and its use in Environmental Research 183 (2020) 108953 relation to respiratory conditions should be conducted in order to clarify the underlying mechanisms behind associated adverse impacts. Forests and soil are a huge source and reservoir of biogenic volatile organic compounds, which can be detrimental to respiratory health (Gibbs, 2019; Goldstein and Galbally, 2007) Knowledge on how these spaces affect human health is crucial in addressing the increasing worldwide prevalence of asthma and allergies and to direct urban and community planning for prevention (De Marco et al, 2012; Ruokolainen, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call