Abstract
ABSTRACT Radiation detected by sensors can reveal information regarding canopy structure and leaf surface properties. It has been shown that the scattering coefficient (Wλ ), a ‘pure’ spectrum obtained after correction for the effect of canopy structure on the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF), can provide information about biochemical composition; e.g. nitrogen content, more objectively. However, specular radiation reflected from leaf surface (without any information from the leaf interior) has a potential influence on Wλ and thus consequently affects the estimation of canopy nitrogen content (CNC). The so-called specular reflection influence has rarely been studied. Polarized reflectance (R p), as part of the specular reflectance, was used to assess this kind of influence. To model the accurate R p within the study area, six bidirectional polarization distribution function (BPDF) models were intercompared, using the existing POLDER/PARASOL R p database, to produce R p for three vegetation types: needleleaf, broadleaf, and mixed forest. Then, correction for polarized reflection and canopy structure was made to yield a more reasonable and accurate Wλ . An efficient interval partial least-squares regression (iPLSR) method for CNC estimation was used to analyse the impact of polarized reflection on both the 400 nm–2,500-nm canopy Wλ and CNC estimation. The results showed that the contribution of polarization was greater in the strong-absorption spectral region, with an influence on Wλ estimation of up to 25% and 28% in the visible and short-wave infrared regions, respectively. Also, improvements of 0.93% in average regarding the relative mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) were seen in CNC estimation accuracy. Moreover, sensitivity analyses of BPDF model parameters, and of the fixed total number of intervals in the iPLSR were also conducted. Improvements with an average of 1.19% regarding the RMSECV was consistently seen in the accuracy of CNC regression after polarization correction, no matter how many fixed intervals were. The results also gave guides on the selection of spectral regions used to estimate forest CNC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.