Abstract

In recent years, the usage of fractional-order (FO) differential equations to describe objects and physical phenomena has gained immense popularity. Due to the high computational complexity in the exact calculation of these equations, approximation models make the calculations executable. Regardless of their complexity, these models always introduce some inaccuracy which depends on the model type and its order. This article shows how the selected model affects the obtained solution. This study revisits seven fractional approximation models, known as the Continued Fraction Expansion method, the Matsuda method, the Carlson method, a modified version of the Stability Boundary Locus fitting method, and Basic, Refined, and Xue Oustaloup filters. First, this work calculates the steady-state values for each of the models symbolically. In the next step, it calculates the unit step responses. Then, it shows how the model selection affects Nyquist plots and compares the results with the plot determined directly. In the last stage, it estimates the trajectories for an example of an FO control system by each model. We conclude that when employing approximation models for fractional integro-differentiation, choosing the appropriate type of model, its parameters, and order is very important. Selecting the wrong model type or wrong order may lead to incorrect conclusions when describing a real phenomenon or object.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.