Abstract

Wetting conditions and fluid–fluid interfacial properties are essential to understanding oil recovery in the context of low-salinity and smart waterflooding. Many have deemed wettability alteration to be the dominant interaction, while some highlight the importance of fluid–fluid interactions. In some rock-fluid systems, benefits from the use of additives can arise to favor hydrocarbon production. Understanding the balance between the fluid–fluid and rock-fluid interactions when utilizing additives is crucial to evaluate benefits in improved efficiency. Ultimately, this understanding will shed light on recovery mechanisms. Regarding oil recovery, previous studies indicate that the injection of a naphthenic acid (NA) blend dissolved in an injection brine improves oil recovery in Berea Sandstone, particularly under low-salinity conditions. Interfacial rheology results for the brine-oil interface correlated well with the recovery response. This observation was speculated to serve as a potential improved recovery mechanism through oil-trapping suppression. However, the said studies did not evaluate potentially concurrent rock wettability alteration during recovery or the initial wetting condition. The purpose of this work is to determine the production behavior in systems with NAs, namely NA-10 (3-Cyclohexanepropinoic acid), NA-14 (Cyclopentane carboxylic acid), NA-18 (Cyclohexane carboxylic acid), and NA-mix (Naphthenic acid mixture), at different initial wetting conditions under spontaneous imbibition. In addition, we tested the NAs ability to alter wettability in Berea Sandstone and determine each “additive’s” capacity to improve recovery. Time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance (TD-NMR), contact angle, and Amott cell tests, i.e. spontaneous imbibition, were used to analyze the influence of the selected naphthenic acids on oil displacement under different initial wetting conditions. Our results indicate that individual naphthenic acids indeed have potential as additives in low-salinity waterflooding for oil-wet systems while negatively impacting recovery in water-wet systems. However, results suggest that the evolution of the interfacial properties and wettability conditions are equally important on the recovery behavior.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call