Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative treatment option for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Vascular inflow occlusion to the liver (Pringle manoeuvre) and multibipolar RFA (mbRFA) represent possibilities to generate large ablations. This study evaluated the impact of different interapplicator distances and a Pringle manoeuvre on ablation area and geometry of mbRFA. 24 mbRFA were planned in porcine livers in vivo. Test series with continuous blood flow had an interapplicator distance of 20 mm and 15 mm, respectively. For a Pringle manoeuvre, interapplicator distance was predefined at 20 mm. After liver dissection, ablation area and geometry were analysed macroscopically and histologically. Confluent and homogenous ablations could be achieved with a Pringle manoeuvre and an interapplicator distance of 15 mm with sustained hepatic blood flow. Ablation geometry was inhomogeneous with an applicator distance of 20 mm with physiological liver perfusion. A Pringle manoeuvre led to a fourfold increase in ablation area in comparison to sustained hepatic blood flow (p < 0.001). Interapplicator distance affects ablation geometry of mbRFA. Strict adherence to the planned applicator distance is advisable under continuous blood flow. The application of a Pringle manoeuvre should be considered when compliance with the interapplicator distance cannot be guaranteed.
Highlights
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative treatment option for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
The objective of this in vivo animal study was to evaluate the impact of the distance between applicators and the impact of a Pringle manoeuvre on ablation area and geometry in multibipolar RFA (mbRFA)
This in vivo animal study demonstrates the importance of an exact positioning of the applicators in mbRFA
Summary
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative treatment option for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Vascular inflow occlusion to the liver (Pringle manoeuvre) and multibipolar RFA (mbRFA) represent possibilities to generate large ablations. This study evaluated the impact of different interapplicator distances and a Pringle manoeuvre on ablation area and geometry of mbRFA. A temporary inflow occlusion of the blood supply to the liver (Pringle manoeuvre) represents a possibility to minimize vascular cooling and increase the maximum ablation a rea[4,5,6]. No in vivo study has evaluated the effect of a distance change between the applicators in no-touch mbRFA so far The objective of this in vivo animal study was to evaluate the impact of the distance between applicators and the impact of a Pringle manoeuvre on ablation area and geometry in mbRFA. A macroscopic analysis of the ablations was verified by a histological evaluation
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have