Abstract

AbstractIn topology optimization with discrete model finite element analysis (FEA), feasible reinforcement domain determines to a large extent the result, and the trade‐off between accuracy and efficiency of optimization as well. Therefore, a cantilever reinforced concrete short beam was comparatively optimized based on five feasible reinforcement domains with complexity at different levels, respectively. The outcomes exhibit that, it is reasonable to evolve reinforcement layout by topology optimization with discrete model FEA. The orientation of diagonal reinforcement in optimal topologies from complex feasible reinforcement domains would correspond more to the orientation of the principal tensile stress than that using simple ones, since complex ones have rebar distribution with high density or diagonal reinforcement with various orientations. After optimization, the global stress level of the reinforcement decreases, and then utilization rate of the reinforcement strength increases. Additionally, the consumption of rebar and the workload of reinforcement engineering only slightly increased, although such optimal reinforcement topologies are relatively complex. Consequently, the mechanical properties of concrete members can be substantially improved by using a more complex feasible reinforcement domain for optimizing rebar distribution. A complex domain should be chosen on the premise of completing the optimization within a reasonable time in engineering applications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call