Abstract

Recently, electrical cordless chainsaws were introduced, which provide less harmful working conditions for the operators, and should therefore be deployed as much as possible in all non-professional and professional applications. The low power of the electric engines may result in lower efficiency and higher energy consumption in the case of over-tensioned chains, due to increased friction between the saw and the chain. Therefore, a partial factorial experiment with one factor on three levels (saw type) and two factors on two levels was designed, whereby a wooden beam was cross-cut at two levels of chain sharpness and tension. The time of cross-cutting and energy consumption were controlled. The chain tension does not have a significant effect onto time of cross cutting, or electricity consumption. Both have cross-cutting and energy consumption have been found to differ significantly when comparing the saws used in the experiment. The average efficiency of cross cutting using electrical chainsaws reported is 2.35 times lower than when using petrol powered saws. The lower efficiency is caused by the lower engine power of electrical saws, and lower speed of chain rotation. Energy consumption and time of cross cutting are significantly higher when using a blunt chain, with large differences in time of cross cutting and electricity consumption, making the chain sharpness the most important of all controlled factors. In the study, we did not find evidence that over tensioning of the chain increases the time of cross cutting or energy consumption, however the integration of such systems is recommended because of the worker’s safety.

Highlights

  • Forests are supplying the world with almost 3.97 billion m3 of wood annually [1,2]

  • We considered the feasibility of development of an automatic chain tension system from the perspective of energy consumption and time of cross cutting, while controlling the chain sharpening and chainsaw type

  • The electricity consumption and cross cutting time are, significantly different when comparing the saws used in the experiment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forests are supplying the world with almost 3.97 billion m3 of wood annually [1,2]. Most wood is supplied from natural, planted forests and plantations [5]. The stagnant oil prices [6] and the uncertainty in the wood market, which is experiencing major structural changes [7], have caused a renewed drive for efficiency in forest operations. Most new plantations and the majority of world forest resources are based in developing countries [8], where the specific socio-economic conditions (e.g., availability of low-cost rural labour) have favored the use of manual or semi-mechanized forest harvesting work techniques [9]. The mechanization of forest operation should be the ethical imperative of any modern society, as it offers great benefits

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call