Influence from numerical noise in the objective function for flow design optimisation

Abstract

The overall pressure drop in an axisymmetric contraction is minimised using two different grid sizes. The transition region was parameterised with only two design variables to make it possible to create surface plots of the objective function in the design space, which were based on 121 CFD calculations for each grid. The coarse grid showed to have significant numerical noise in the objective function while the finer grid had less numerical noise. The optimisation was performed with two methods, a Response Surface Model (RSM) and a gradient‐based method (the Method of Feasible Directions) to study the influence from numerical noise. Both optimisation methods were able to find the global optimum with the two different grid sizes (the search path for the gradient‐based method on the coarse grid was able to avoid the region in the design space containing local minima). However, the RSM needed fewer iterations in reaching the optimum. From a grid convergence study at two points in the design space the level of noise appeared to be sufficiently low, when the relative step size is 10–4 for the finite difference calculations, to not influence the convergence if the errors are below 5 per cent for this contraction geometry.