Abstract
According to the operating specifications of existing electric field measuring instruments, measuring technicians must be located far from the instruments to eliminate the influence of the human body occupancy on a spatial electric field. Nevertheless, in order to develop a portable safety protection instrument with an effective electric field warning function for working staff in a high-voltage environment, it is necessary to study the influence of an approaching human body on the measurement of an electric field and to correct the measurement results. A single-shaft electric field measuring instrument called the Type LP-2000, which was developed by our research team, is used as the research object in this study. First, we explain the principle of electric field measurement and describe the capacitance effect produced by the human body. Through a theoretical analysis, we show that the measured electric field value decreases as a human body approaches. Their relationship is linearly proportional. Then, the ratio is identified as a correction coefficient to correct for the influence of human body proximity. The conclusion drawn from the theoretical analysis is proved via simulation. The correction coefficient kb = 1.8010 is obtained on the basis of the linear fitting of simulated data. Finally, a physical experiment is performed. When no human is present, we compare the results from the Type LP-2000 measured with Narda EFA-300 and the simulated value to verify the accuracy of the Type LP-2000. For the case of an approaching human body, the correction coefficient kb* = 1.9094 is obtained by comparing the data measured with the Type LP-2000 to the simulated value. The correction coefficient obtained from the experiment (i.e., kb*) is highly consistent with that obtained from the simulation (i.e., kb). Two experimental programs are set; under these programs, the excitation voltages and distance measuring points are regulated to produce different electric field intensities. Using kb = 1.9094, the corrected measurement of electric field intensity can accurately reflect the original environmental electric field intensity, and the maximal error is less than 6% in all the data comparisons. These results verify the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Highlights
Strong electric fields exist around high-voltage electrical equipment
Regulating the Excitation Voltages of Electric Field measured by Type LP-2000, in general, is relatively close to the stimulation value and the value
The influence of the human body on electric field measurement was investigated by using the Type LP-2000 single-shaft electric field measuring sensor developed by our research team
Summary
Existing research shows that strong power-frequency electric fields have potential harmful effects on human health and safety [1]. If practitioners can be equipped with a portable safety protection instrument that can measure the electric field intensity of a working area in real time and issue a safety precaution, the safety and health of practitioners in the workplace can be ensured. Many research teams have studied and developed electric field measuring instruments for special purposes [11,12,13]. In [15], the existence of a human body was proposed to make the spatial electric field change in a certain range. The electric field generated by different excitation voltages in the absence of a human body is measured with a Type LP-2000 and Narda.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have