Abstract

Plant molecular systematic studies of closely related taxa have relied heavily on sequence data from nuclear ITS and cpDNA. Positive attributes of using ITS sequence data include the rapid rate of evolution compared to most plastid loci and availability of universal primers for amplification and sequencing. On the other hand, ITS sequence data may not adequately track organismal phylogeny if concerted evolution and high rDNA array copy number do not permit identification of orthologous copies. Shaw et al. (American Journal of Botany 92: 142-166) recently identified nine plastid regions that appear to provide more potentially informative characters than many other plastid loci. In the present study, sequences of these loci and ITS were obtained for six taxonomic groups in which phylogenetic relationships have been difficult to establish using other data. The relative utility of these regions was compared by assessing the number of parsimony informative characters, character congruence, resolution of inferred trees, clade support, and accuracy. No single locus emerged as the best in all lineages for any of these measures of utility. Results further indicated that in preliminary studies, sampling strategy should include at least four exemplar taxa. The importance of sampling data from independent distributions is also discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call