Abstract

Inferno: An Anatomy of American Punishment. By Robert A. Ferguson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. 337 pp. $29.95 paper.In this learned and emotionally charged book, Robert Ferguson, Professor of law, literature and criticism at Columbia University, asks questions usually elided by specialists in criminal law and criminology. Why are Americans so ready to punish fellow citizens with prison sentences, sometimes astoundingly long ones? Why do Americans seem to care so little about what the lives are like of people they actually exile to those prisons? Is the combination of mass incarceration and chronically overcrowded and inhumane prisons for which the United States is now globally infamous a result of good intentions gone awry? Or is this precisely our intention in voting for laws that produce, and approving elected public officials who preside over, prisons that deny human dignity in the words of Justice Kennedy's landmark Brown v. Plata (2011) decision capping California's prison population?The basic figures and facts about mass incarceration in the U.S. today are well-known, but this book moves into topics and sources generally ignored. Ferguson takes far more seriously than most critics of mass incarceration the formal legitimacy of prison as punishment for crime. To critics the crime explanation for punitive legitimacy is a sham or an ideological effect of a system premised on a racialized system of caste control system. But these accounts, as crucial as they have been to defining the evil of mass incarceration, cannot explain why it retains the enormous legitimacy it has even now in contemporary American society. Ferguson seeks to understand what could be called our to punish.To do so Ferguson provides an anatomy of the logics and institutions that amplify that will into an extraordinary vehicle of coercive power beginning with Friedrich Nietzsche's observation that all the rational purposes bestowed on punishment by eager reformers could not cover up its essential propensity toward cruelty. The problem Ferguson discovers with punishment is not that it is too hard to rationalize, but that it is too easy to do so. Our reasons can always make punishment seem compelling and no sense of proportionality can survive the stacking of ends that can transform human lives into mere means of penal action. Worst of all perhaps is retribution, which law professors even now believe can somehow save us from over punishment with its implications of proportionality. But it is precisely because retribution can both take on much of the extra punitiveness of consequentialist rationales like incapacitation and yet be wrapped in a smooth surface of moral legitimacy that it supports rather than checks excess punishment.Throughout the book, Ferguson is driven by the agonizing insight that the very nature of the prison makes its inhumanity invisible and, thus, unremarkable to most of us most of the time. He seeks to fill the gap between the metaphor of time served, and the reality of overcrowded prisons dominated by the norms of prison gangs and hostile prison officers.Throughout the chapters, he includes individual stories of suffering as well as facts about the qualitative nature of imprisonment, its overcrowding, its physical insecurity, its lack of meaningful pathways of rehabilitation. …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.