Abstract
Urinary tract devices, often placed to alleviate obstruction or serve as support for surgical anastamosis, are used with increasing frequency. Although useful, they are fraught with hazards, especially infection. Infected devices have a myriad of clinical presentations that can be unrevealing or even misleading as to the underlying disease process. The astute clinician should maintain a high index of suspicion for such infections. Urinalysis alone has not been adequately studied to demonstrate that it alone can rule out infected foreign material in the urinary tract and should be followed by culture. Failure to recognize and treat infected urological hardware might lead to more rapid progression to ascending infection and more severe illness than expected in the absence of such devices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
