Abstract

BackgroundWhen calculating life expectancy, it is usually assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals. As most of the infant deaths are neonatal deaths, this calls for a better assessment for that age group.MethodsThe Flemish unified death and birth certificates database for all calendar years between 1999 and 2008 was used. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis on a yearly basis was performed to assess the mean time-to-event and to compare survival curves between both genders.ResultsOver the last years, a slight though not steady decrease of the infant mortality rate is observed. In 2008, the probability among live births of dying before their first anniversary is 4.6‰ in boys and 3.5‰ in girls. The large majority (about 85%) of these have died in their year of birth. The mean survival time of deaths in their year of birth was found to centre around 1 month (about 30 days), which results in a 'mean proportion of the calendar year lived' (k1) close to 0.09. Among those who died in the year after their year of birth yet before their first anniversary, no such concentration in time of the deaths is observed. Differences between the gender groups are small and generally not statistically significant.ConclusionStatistics Belgium, the federal statistics office, imputes a value for k1 equal to 0.1 for infant deaths in their year of birth when calculating life expectancy. Our data fully support this value. We think such refinement is generally feasible in calculating life expectancy.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIt is usually assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals

  • When calculating life expectancy, it is usually assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals

  • When calculating life expectancy, it is assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals, which translates into the imputation of an additional 0.5 years of life for the deceased in their year of death

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is usually assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals. Objective When calculating life expectancy, it is assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals, which translates into the imputation of an additional 0.5 years of life for the deceased in their year of death. This generally holds for all ages, except for the youngest age group, and probably for the oldest age group as well (above 80) [1-3]. The striking feature is that most of the deaths among live births are concentrated in the very first days This fact urges us to adopt some factor k notably inferior to 0.5 for the mean. Location of k-factors within the life table Usually, life expectancies are derived from so-called period life tables in which age-specific mortality risks based on observations that occurred within successive birth cohorts in a given period of time (typically a calendar year), are applied to one hypothetical birth cohort under the assumption that the risks do not change over time

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.