Abstract

Much research has estimated induced land use changes (ILUCs) and emissions for first generation biofuels. Relatively little has provided estimates for the second generation biofuels. This paper estimates ILUC emissions for the first and second generation biofuels. Estimated ILUC emissions are uncertain not only because their associated land use changes are uncertain, but also because of uncertainty in the land use emission factors (EFs). This paper also examines uncertainties related to these factors. The results suggest that converting crop residues to biofuel has no significant ILUC emissions, but that is not the case for dedicated energy crops. Use of dedicated energy crops transfers managed natural land and marginal land (cropland-pasture) to crop production. Producing biogasoline from miscanthus generates the lowest land requirement among alterative pathways. The largest land requirement is associated with switchgrass. The difference is due largely to the assumed yields of switchgrass and miscanthus. The three major conclusions from uncertainty in emissions analyses are (1) inclusion or exclusion of cropland-pasture makes a huge difference; (2) changes in soil carbon sequestration due to changes in land cover vegetation play an important role; and (3) there is wide divergence among the emission factor sources, especially for dedicated crop conversion to ethanol.

Highlights

  • The land use consequences of global biofuel programs and their contributions to GHG emissions have been the focal point of many debates and research studies in recent years

  • We first calculate induced land use changes (ILUCs) emissions for the biofuel pathways presented in Table 3 in combination with the emission factors (EFs) obtained based on Woods Hole, California Air Resources Board (CARB), and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) databases which ignore impacts of changes in soil carbon sequestration due to changes in land cover vegetation

  • We observed that under this assumption the CARB and TEM emission factors lead to somewhat similar estimates for ILUC emissions for every biofuel examined in this paper. Given this fact and given that the assumptions behind the CARB emission factors are very detailed, in this test we only examine the sensitivity of results with respect to changes in the base case assumptions used in construction of the TEM EFs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The land use consequences of global biofuel programs and their contributions to GHG emissions have been the focal point of many debates and research studies in recent years Research studies in this field usually estimate ILUC emissions in two phases. Wicke et al [1] reviewed major studies in this area and highlighted deficiencies of economic models used to assess the ILUCs due to biofuels and their corresponding uncertainties. Most of these studies focused on the land use emissions due to first generation biofuels such as corn ethanol, sugarcane ethanol, and biodiesel. Uncertainties in EFs and their consequences for the estimated ILUCs for alternative biofuel pathways are examined

ILUCs due to Selected Biofuel Pathways
EFs and Their Backgrounds
ILUC Emissions and Sensitivity Tests
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call