Abstract

BackgroundIn acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is variable according to different degrees of lung recruitability. The search for a tool to individualize PEEP based on patients’ individual response is warranted.End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) assessment by nitrogen washin-washout aids bedside estimation of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and may therefore help titrate PEEP on patient’s individual recruitability.We designed a randomized trial to test whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol driven by EELV measurement may improve a composite clinical outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (IPERPEEP trial).MethodsIPERPEEP is an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial that will be conducted in 10 intensive care units in Italy and will enroll 132 ARDS patients showing PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 150 mmHg within 24 h from endotracheal intubation while on mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH2O.To standardize lung volumes at study initiation, all patients will undergo mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight and PEEP set to obtain a plateau pressure within 28 and 30 cmH2O for 30 min (EXPRESS PEEP).Afterwards, a 5-step decremental PEEP trial will be conducted (EXPRESS PEEP to PEEP 5 cmH2O), and EELV will be measured at each step. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio will be calculated for each PEEP range from EELV difference. Patients will be then randomized to receive mechanical ventilation with PEEP set according to the optimal recruitment observed in the PEEP trial (IPERPEEP arm) trial or to achieve a plateau pressure of 28–30 cmH2O (control arm, EXPRESS strategy). In both groups, tidal volume size, use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents, and weaning from PEEP and from mechanical ventilation will be standardized.The primary endpoint of the study is a composite clinical outcome incorporating in-ICU mortality, 60-day ventilator-free days, and serum interleukin-6 concentration over the course of the initial 72 h of treatment.DiscussionThe IPERPEEP study is a randomized trial powered to elucidate whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol based on bedside assessment of lung recruitability can improve a composite clinical outcome during moderate-to-severe ARDS.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04012073. Registered 9 July 2019.

Highlights

  • In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is variable according to different degrees of lung recruitability

  • The IPERPEEP study is a randomized trial powered to elucidate whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol based on bedside assessment of lung recruitability can improve a composite clinical outcome during moderate-to-severe ARDS

  • Mechanical ventilator will be set according to the following strategy: VT = 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight; inspiratory flow set at 60 l/min resulting in an end-inspiratory pause of 0.3–0.5 s; respiratory rate 20–35 to maintain pH > 7.30, PEEP set so that the plateau (PPLAT) pressure will be within the following limits: PPLAT = 28–30 cmH2O (EXPRESS PEEP), Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) set to achieve a Oxygen peripheral saturation (SpO2) > 88–95% and not higher than 90%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is variable according to different degrees of lung recruitability. We designed a randomized trial to test whether an individualized PEEP setting protocol driven by EELV measurement may improve a composite clinical outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (IPERPEEP trial). Over the last decade, great effort has been made to identify the PEEP-setting strategy that balances the need for lung recruitment and PEEP-induced alveolar overdistension; PEEP titration methods based on respiratory system compliance [9,10,11], oxygenation, shunt value s[12, 13], and pressure-volume curve [14] have been proposed. Higher PEEP yielded a shorter time to successful weaning in the EXPRESS study, especially in most severe patients [10]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call