Abstract

Neural phase-locking to temporal fluctuations is a fundamental and unique mechanism by which acoustic information is encoded by the auditory system. The perceptual role of this metabolically expensive mechanism, the neural phase-locking to temporal fine structure (TFS) in particular, is debated. Although hypothesized, it is unclear whether auditory perceptual deficits in certain clinical populations are attributable to deficits in TFS coding. Efforts to uncover the role of TFS have been impeded by the fact that there are no established assays for quantifying the fidelity of TFS coding at the individual level. While many candidates have been proposed, for an assay to be useful, it should not only intrinsically depend on TFS coding, but should also have the property that individual differences in the assay reflect TFS coding per se over and beyond other sources of variance. Here, we evaluate a range of behavioral and electroencephalogram (EEG)-based measures as candidate individualized measures of TFS sensitivity. Our comparisons of behavioral and EEG-based metrics suggest that extraneous variables dominate both behavioral scores and EEG amplitude metrics, rendering them ineffective. After adjusting behavioral scores using lapse rates, and extracting latency or percent-growth metrics from EEG, interaural timing sensitivity measures exhibit robust behavior-EEG correlations. Together with the fact that unambiguous theoretical links can be made relating binaural measures and phase-locking to TFS, our results suggest that these “adjusted” binaural assays may be well suited for quantifying individual TFS processing.

Highlights

  • All acoustic information we receive is conveyed through the firing rate and/or timing of the neural spikes of cochlear neurons

  • Similar to previous reports of large individual differences in the amplitude modulation (AM) and ENV-based interaural time difference (ITD) detection thresholds across normal-hearing (NH) listeners (Bharadwaj et al, 2015), both the frequency modulation (FM) and temporal fine structure (TFS)-based

  • Neither FM nor ITD thresholds correlated with the audiograms; the two measures were significantly correlated with each other in a simple linear regression analysis (r = 0.44, p = 0.01, n = 33)

Read more

Summary

Significance Statement

The auditory system is unique among the senses in that neurons in the periphery fire precisely phaselocked spikes in response to fast temporal fluctuations in sound. We establish behavioral and physiological assays that can probe the fidelity of this phase-locking mechanism at the level of individual human subjects. These measures pave the way for future experiments that can more directly address foundational questions about the role of phase locking in everyday hearing, and test whether phase-locking deficits contribute to the listening difficulties in clinical populations. Our results show that commonly used measures to assess phase locking are affected by extraneous variables, and ineffective

Introduction
Participants
Materials and Methods
Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses
Results measures of TFS coding
Candidate subcortical correlates of TFS processing
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call