Abstract

The present study was directed to the evaluation of an abbreviated methodology for the study of Vroom and Yetton's normative model ( Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W., Leadership and decision making, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973 ) of leadership decisions and the determination of the extent and nature of individual differences in responses to Vroom—Yetton problems. Subjects' decisions in leadership situations were explored using as stimuli only the presence or absence of problem attributes rather than cases ( Vroom & Yetton, 1973). The degree of variance attributable to individual differences and situations was evaluated for 33 subjects. Groups of individuals were identified by principal components analysis and the nature of those groups' decision strategies was examined by analysis of variance of their responses. The results indicate the abbreviated methodology yields results substantially similar to those obtained by Vroom and Yetton (1973). A major proportion of the variance is attributable to situations; however, there are interpretable individual differences in decision strategy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.