Abstract
The article begins with Amartya Sen's observation that democratic institutions and a free press enable a country to combat the threat of famine. Looking at the situation in Kalahandi in the Indian state of Orissa, an attempt is made to discuss the extent to which an independent and active press, together with opposition political parties, can provide an early warning of impending food crises, and thereafter hold the government and the administration accountable for inadequate implementation of relief. Kalahandi has faced recurrent drought and famine conditions over the years, although the situation has particularly deteriorated in recent times. Is the case of Kalahandi an exception to India's otherwise successful record in combating famines? If so, why?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
