Abstract
ABSTRACT While there is considerable debate concerning curriculum and qualifications in education for the professions, more account needs to be taken of evidence that professional competence may be related more to modes of study than to syllabus content. Though there may be pressures of innovation within disciplines which seem to legitimise heavier content loadings, the commitment to content-based courses can also be viewed, in Kuhnian terms, as covert instruction in the dominant paradigm of a discipline. Whatever the merits of this as a socialisation process into the profession, or as a means of protecting professional monopolies, it may entail passive modes of learning rather than development of competence to deal with change; to achieve, for example, the techne quality in engineering advocated by CNAA in the wake of Finniston. The strongest empirical evidence that course content is a poor indicator of professional competence comes from McLelland and his associates, through studies relating to over 50 c...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.