Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the grammatical status of independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish, i.e. constructions introduced by the complementizer att or at but without an accompanying main clause. These constructions can be used with two main functions: to express the speaker's evaluation of a presupposed state of affairs, or to elaborate on an aspect of the preceding discourse. In recent literature on these and similar constructions in other languages, both types have been analyzed as instances of the category of insubordination (Evans, 2007), i.e. constructions that combine subordinate marking with main clause use. We will argue that this analysis works well for the ‘expressive’ type, but that it cannot account for some of the typical properties of the ‘elaborative’ constructions, like the fact that they are pragmatically dependent and inconsistent in their use of subordinate marking. As an alternative, we will show that elaborative constructions can be dealt with much more naturally in terms of an existing model of dependency shift in clause combining, like the subordinate–coordinate shifts observed for many other types of subordinators.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.