Abstract

In most Member States competition law powers have been granted to a more or less independent competition authority. The idea is that the application and enforcement of competition law should not be influenced by political and volatile considerations. However, some recent cases, most notably in the field of merger control, show that political considerations can creep into the decision-making process in competition law. In this paper we examine how the independence of the competition authorities in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and the European Union vis-a-vis the political system has actually been regulated. We have not only looked at the independent position from the political sphere, but also at the internal design of the competition authority, i.e. how it is managed. It appears that none of the national legislators has opted for total independence. But the national competition authorities have been confronted with less political control than in the past. For the Commission, this is different, as the Commissioner for Competition does not act independently from other Commissioners, which causes an imbalance between the status of national competition authorities and the Commission. Therefore, it could be considered whether an advisory agency might be set up, having that task to issue recommendations in the field of European competition law.

Highlights

  • An important issue regarding the implementation of competition law is the position of the body entrusted with this implementation task

  • We examine how the independence of competition authorities vis-à-vis the political system has been regulated in several competition law systems in the EU

  • We study the extent to which the national competition law systems have responded to developments in EC competition law, and in particular what influence these developments have had on the institutional structure of the national competition authorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important issue regarding the implementation of competition law is the position of the body entrusted with this implementation task. By delegating competition law powers to an independent body, the legislature tries to guarantee that the application and interpretation of competition rules is mainly based upon economic and legal arguments alone, and is not shaped by political pressure In this contribution the point of departure is that an independent status of competition authorities is considered good practice ( this is sometimes questioned in literature).[2] But some recent cases, most notably in the field of merger control,[3] show that political considerations can creep into the decision-making process in competition law. The recent modernization process in European competition law (decentralization of the application of the EC competition rules as brought about by Regulation 1/2003, which entered into force on 1 May 2004)[4] has had a considerable impact upon the national competition systems of the Member States

The Commission in European competition law
The competent authorities in German competition law
In English
The competent authorities in UK competition law
The competent authorities in Dutch competition law
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call