Abstract

Fleeting changes in economic, political and social life dictate the need for changes in the legal field, where the work is not only lawyers but also forensic medical experts, the main job is to help the judicial and investigative authorities in establishing the truth in specific cases where crimes against life, health, honor and dignity. In this article the difficulties with which forensic medical expert has faced during determining the degree of injuries under the criteria of "indelible disfigurement of face" and suggested ways to resolve the conflicts are analyzed.
 Objective. Analyzation of forensic and legal approaches to solve questions and to find ways to resolve conflicts.
 Conclusion. We are convinced that no specialist whether the forensic medical expert, an investigator or a judge can not single-handedly solve the problem of disfigurement of face, therefore consider it appropriate to solve the research question within the commission or a comprehensive forensic examination, a fundamental part of which is determined by the person that appointed it to the list of specialists who have the necessary aesthetic ideas to solve the issue on its merits. Order or decision of the representatives of the law enforcement bodies confirm the powers of the Commission within the issues to be addressed and, accordingly, take the possible claims, by the exit of members of the expert committee for the limits of its competence.
 Despite the fact that our opinion may not be absolutely perfect, this publication we invite experts of forensic experts and lawyers to fruitful discussions and address the issues raised.

Highlights

  • The most promising algorithm for assessing the severity of maxillofacial injuries with regard to anatomic and functional changes included in the MFISS system, that is limited to the lack of a unified approach for the diagnostics of different types of tooth-jaw apparatus injuries, especially to the mechanism of formation of maxillofacial fractures during traffic accident, adherence to the AIS- 90 criteria as a basic estimation parameter and due to the verification errors of dental status lesions at the stage of initial diagnostics of the victims

  • Особливо контраст з визначення ступеня тяжкості та його зміни є помітним при дорожньо-транспортних пригодах, коли легкі тілесні ушкодження відносяться до адміністративних правопорушень, а середньої тяжкості та тяжкі до кримінальних

  • Відповідно для її повного формулювання спеціальних знань немає ані у судово-медичного експерта, ані у представників судово-слідчих органів

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most promising algorithm for assessing the severity of maxillofacial injuries with regard to anatomic and functional changes included in the MFISS system, that is limited to the lack of a unified approach for the diagnostics of different types of tooth-jaw apparatus injuries, especially to the mechanism of formation of maxillofacial fractures during traffic accident, adherence to the AIS- 90 criteria as a basic estimation parameter and due to the verification errors of dental status lesions at the stage of initial diagnostics of the victims. В роботі аналізуються труднощі, з якими стикається судово-медичний експерт при визначенні ступеня тяжкості спричинених тілесних ушкоджень за критерієм «невиправне знівечення обличчя» і пропонуються шляхи усунення протиріч. Ключові слова: судово-медична експертиза, невиправне знівечення обличчя, ступінь тяжкості тілесних ушкоджень

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call