Abstract
AbstractBackgroundWe previously found greater spatial extent of flortaucipir (tau) PET elevations in Arizona‐Boston (DETECT) Study of 26 former National Football League (NFL) players than in 31 normal controls—using a voxel‐based Majority Count Statistics (MCS) algorithm which enabled us to detect tau PET abnormalities in the player group free from the inflated Type 1 error associated with voxel‐wise multiple comparisons (Stern et al, NEJM 2019). We now confirm this finding in a larger group of former NFL players, former college football players and asymptomatic controls without exposure to repetitive head impacts from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project.MethodFlortaucipir PET images were acquired in 106 former NFL players, 51 former college players, and 53 unexposed controls, 57.71+8.37 years of age. An automated algorithm (SPM12) and co‐registered MRIs were used to spatially normalize PET images into Montreal Neurological Institute template, and compute statistical brain maps of group differences in regional cerebral‐to‐cerebellar crus1 standard uptake value ratio (SUVR), controlling for the participants’ age and race with P≤0.005, uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Our MCS was then applied with 1,000 iterations to test the hypothesis that there would be a greater number of cerebral voxels with SUVR elevations in each and combined player group versus control group, as well as between the NFL versus college player groups.ResultAs predicted, the NFL, college player and aggregate player groups each had significantly more cerebral voxels with flortaucipir SUVR elevations than in the control group (postulated vs opposite directions: 53,879 vs 79, 79,552 vs 89 and 100,837 vs 86 voxels), respectively, MCS P<0.001, but not between former NFL and former college players (482 versus 306, p = 0.305).ConclusionUsing a voxel based MCS analysis, former NFL and college football players have a greater spatial extent of elevations in tau PET measurements than asymptomatic controls. Additional work is needed to clarify the biological nature of these small but spatially extensive elevations, the extent to which they are related to symptom severity, cognitive performance, repetitive head impact exposure, and other risk or resilience factors, and the extent to which they are associated with subsequent clinical decline.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.