Abstract

The existence of a trade-off between current and future reproduction is a fundamental prediction of life history theory. Support for this prediction comes from brood size manipulations, showing that caring for enlarged broods often reduces the parent's future survival or fecundity. However, in many species, individuals must invest in competing for the resources required for future reproduction. Thus, a neglected aspect of this trade-off is that increased allocation to current reproduction may reduce an individual's future competitive ability. We tested this prediction in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides, a species where parents care for their offspring and where there is fierce competition for resources used for breeding. We manipulated reproductive effort by providing females with either a small brood of 10 larvae or a large brood of 40 larvae and compared the ability of these females, and virgin females that had no prior access to a carcass, to compete for a second carcass against a virgin competitor. We found that increased allocation to current reproduction reduced future competitive ability, as females that had cared for a small brood were more successful when competing for a second carcass against a virgin competitor than females that had cared for a large brood. In addition, the costs of reproduction were offset by the benefits of feeding from the carcass during an initial breeding attempt, as females that had cared for a small brood were better competitors than virgin females that had no prior access to a carcass, whilst females that had cared for a large brood were similar in competitive ability to virgin females. Our results add to our understanding of the trade-off between current and future reproduction by showing that this trade-off can manifest through differences in future competitive ability and that direct benefits of reproduction can offset some of these costs.

Highlights

  • The existence of a trade-off between current and future reproduction, known as the cost of reproduction, is a central prediction of life history theory (Williams 1966)

  • We found that increased allocation to current reproduction reduced future competitive ability, as females that had cared for a small brood were more successful when competing for a second carcass against a virgin competitor than females that had cared for a large brood

  • 14 As predicted, increased allocation to current reproduction in an initial breeding attempt reduced future competitive ability as females that had cared for a small brood were more likely to win a subsequent contest against a size-matched virgin competitor than females that had cared for a large brood or a virgin, control female that had not bred before

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence of a trade-off between current and future reproduction, known as the cost of reproduction, is a central prediction of life history theory (Williams 1966). This tradeoff is predicted because reproduction and somatic maintenance compete for the same pool of limited resources (Smith & Fretwell 1974; van Noordwijk & de Jong 1986; Lessels 1991; Roff 2002; Flatt & Heyland 2011), such that increased allocation to one function will reduce allocation to the other (Stearns 1992). Individuals that allocate more to the production and care of current offspring should suffer from reduced future survival and/or fecundity This prediction is supported by brood size manipulations used to experimentally alter current reproductive effort. Evidence for a cost of reproduction is mixed, as some studies find no relationship (or a positive one) between reproductive effort and future survival (Santos & Nakagawa 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call