Abstract

Event-based biogeographic methods, such as dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis, have become increasingly popular for attempting to reconstruct the biogeographic history of organisms. Such methods employ distributional data of sampled species and a dated phylogenetic tree to estimate ancestral distribution ranges. Because the input tree is often a single consensus tree, uncertainty in topology and age estimates are rarely accounted for, even when they may affect the outcome of biogeographic estimates. Even when such uncertainties are taken into account for estimates of ancestral ranges, they are usually ignored when researchers compare competing biogeographic hypotheses. We explore the effect of incorporating this uncertainty in a biogeographic analysis of the 21 species of sand spiders (Sicariidae: Sicarius) from Neotropical xeric biomes, based on a total-evidence phylogeny including a complete sampling of the genus. Using a custom R script, we account for uncertainty in ages and topology by estimating ancestral ranges over a sample of trees from the posterior distribution of a Bayesian analysis, and for uncertainty in biogeographic estimates by using stochastic maps. This approach allows for counting biogeographic events such as dispersal among areas, counting lineages through time per area, and testing biogeographic hypotheses, while not overestimating the confidence in a single topology. Including uncertainty in ages indicates that Sicarius dispersed to the Galapagos Islands when the archipelago was formed by paleo-islands that are now submerged; model comparison strongly favors a scenario where dispersal took place before the current islands emerged. We also investigated past connections among currently disjunct Neotropical dry forests; failing to account for topological uncertainty underestimates possible connections among the Caatinga and Andean dry forests in favor of connections among Caatinga and Caribbean + Mesoamerican dry forests. Additionally, we find that biogeographic models including a founder-event speciation parameter (“+J”) are more prone to suffer from the overconfidence effects of estimating ancestral ranges using a single topology. This effect is alleviated by incorporating topological and age uncertainty while estimating stochastic maps, increasing the similarity in the inference of biogeographic events between models with or without a founder-event speciation parameter. We argue that incorporating phylogenetic uncertainty in biogeographic hypothesis-testing is valuable and should be a commonplace approach in the presence of rogue taxa or wide confidence intervals in age estimates, and especially when using models including founder-event speciation.

Highlights

  • The reconstruction of the biogeographic history of organisms is one of the main aims of systematic biology

  • Only tips of the phylogeny may be ‘polymorphic’ and occur in more than one area simultaneously, and important biogeographic processes such as vicariance are not modeled at all. This changed with the advent of event-based biogeography methods, pioneered by dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA) [3]. Such methods attempt to explain the current distribution of organisms by modeling biogeographic events such as dispersal, range contractions and allopatry

  • Because it has been demonstrated that models including founder-event speciation are prone to over-fitting [5]; but see [49], we here show results of the ancestral range estimates for the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree under DIVA-like (Figure 2); results under DIVA-like + J

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reconstruction of the biogeographic history of organisms is one of the main aims of systematic biology. Only tips of the phylogeny may be ‘polymorphic’ and occur in more than one area simultaneously, and important biogeographic processes such as vicariance are not modeled at all This changed with the advent of event-based biogeography methods, pioneered by dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA) [3]. Modifications of DIVA and DEC have been implemented and further elaborated in software packages for biogeography, such as RASP [8] and BioGeoBEARS [9,10] The latter has become popular due to its flexible implementation of biogeographic models allowing for different types of cladogenetic events, such as allopatry, subset sympatry, and founderevent speciation [10,11]; in addition, all models are implemented in a likelihood framework, allowing direct model comparison. It allows incorporating prior information, such as dispersal probabilities among areas, to put biogeographic hypotheses to test in an explicit manner (e.g., [12])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call