Abstract

AimTo investigate the incidence and risk factors of microscopically positive proximal margins in Chinese patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.MethodsThe medical records of 483 patients, who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in a single high-volume tertiary medical center, were reviewed. Demographic, radiographic, endoscopic, pathologic, and treatment-related variables were evaluated. All proximal margins were re-evaluated by two experienced pathologists, and a positive proximal margin was defined as the microscopic presence of invasive tumor cells seen at the esophageal transaction margin submitted en face on final paraffin sections.ResultsThe incidence of positive proximal margins was 23.81% in this series. Siewert type, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node involvement, presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion, and presence of perineural invasion were significantly associated with positive proximal margins. On multivariate analysis, the presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion and advanced-stage disease were independent risk factors for positive proximal margins in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.ConclusionResidual cancer at proximal resection margins remains a major issue for the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in China.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer remains one of the most prevalent causes of cancer-related death in China [1]

  • Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AGE) was defined as an adenocarcinoma with its center within 5 cm proximal and distal to the anatomic gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and was divided into three types according to Siewert’s classification

  • The macroscopic length of the proximal tumor margin was more than 5 cm in most patients with AGE, and the average node harvest was 14.6665.69

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer remains one of the most prevalent causes of cancer-related death in China [1]. Siewert and Stein [7] proposed a widely approved classification of AGE in 1996 that divided AGE into three subgroups based on the distance between the tumor epicenter and the esophagogastric junction line (EGJ). Type I is defined as a tumor in which the center is located 1 to 5 cm above the EGJ, regardless of invasion to the EGJ. Type II tumors straddle the EGJ line and are believed to be true EGJ cancers in which the epicenter is located between 1 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ. Type III tumors are subcardial gastric cancers invading the EGJ, with the epicenter 2 to 5 cm below the EGJ

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call