Abstract

AIM:The mains topics of this work are the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch and the influence in the early results of isolated aortic valve surgery.METHODS:In 193 patients isolated aortic valve surgery was performed. The study population was divided in three subgroups: 20 patients with severe, 131 patients with moderate and 42 patients without patient-prosthesis mismatch. The indexed effective orifice area was used to define the subgroups. Operative mortality and perioperative complications were considered the indicators of the early results of aortic valve surgery.RESULTS:The incidence of severe and moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch was respectively 10.3% and 67.8%. Hospital mortality and perioperative complications were: mortality 5% vs. 3.1% vs. 2.4% (p = 0.855), low cardiac output 5% vs. 6.9% vs. 4.8% (p = 0.861); pulmonary complications 5% vs. 3.1 vs. 0.0% (p = 0.430); exploration for bleeding 5% vs. 0.8% vs. 2.4% (p = 0.319); atrial fibrillation 30% vs. 19.8% vs. 11.9% (p = 0.225); wound infection 5% vs. 0.8% vs. 0.00% (p = 0.165), respectively for the group with severe, moderate and without patient-prosthesis mismatch.CONCLUSIONS:Patient-prosthesis mismatch is a common occurrence in aortic valve surgery. This phenomenon does not affect the early results of aortic valve surgery.

Highlights

  • Patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is one of the most controversial issues related to the aortic valve replacement

  • Patient-prosthesis mismatch is a common occurrence after aortic valve replacement

  • The mains topics of this work are the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve surgery and the influence of these findings in the early results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is one of the most controversial issues related to the aortic valve replacement. It is introduced in 1978 by Rahimtoola as a condition in which the effective prosthetic valve area, after insertion into the patient, is less than that of a normal human valve [1]. There are two main occurrence factors of PPM: a) Effective orifice area “in vivo” and “in vitro” of the prosthesis; and (EOAi). Based on this index, threshold for the appearance of PPM is 0.85 cm2/m2. Patient-prosthesis mismatch is a common occurrence after aortic valve replacement. The discussion is still open about the impact of this phenomenon in the results of this kind of surgery

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call