Abstract

Emergency driving entails substantially higher risk rates than ordinary driving, and it is crucial that other road users notice the emergency vehicles on call. Sirens and emergency lights are used to warn and demand that other road users give way and provide safe passage, but accidents still occur. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of a broadcast hyper local Emergency Vehicle Approaching (EVA) message via RDS radio, noticing that an emergency vehicle on call is approaching and demands that others give way, on the propensity of individual drivers to give way. In two simulator experiments, a total of 90 car drivers participated. In Experiment 1, drivers were passed three times by an ambulance in traffic conditions where it was easy to detect the ambulance early, and two versions of EVA message were compared to a baseline condition without a broadcast message. In Experiment 2, drivers were passed only once by an ambulance and in traffic conditions that made it difficult to detect the ambulance early, and either received an EVA message, or no message. The results showed that EVA messaging made drivers give way earlier and learned to give way earlier even without an EVA message. The main finding was that EVA messaging was necessary for making inexperienced drivers give way to an approaching emergency vehicle on call. Most of them did not know that they are obliged to give way, and some did not notice the emergency vehicle before it passed them. In conclusion, the study suggests that EVA messaging to alert and instruct drivers how to give way properly is beneficial for traffic safety and for enabling time-efficient emergency transports.

Highlights

  • Risk of accidents in connection with emergency driving have been more or less proportional to the increase of traffic and traffic density (Wilbur, 1997; Burke et al, 2001; Lundälv et al, 2010)

  • Emergency driving is further complicated by traffic intensity, which varies considerably depending on the site of the accident, where the emergency vehicle is in relation to the accident site and because on actions taken by other road users, such as their reactions as they notice the warning lights and sirens (Vägverket, 2008)

  • With regard to the three levels of Emergency Vehicle Approaching (EVA) Message, the present paper only focuses on the difference between no EVA message and presence of EVA message (i.e., EVA 0 vs. EVA 1 and EVA), but not between the two versions of the EVA message (i.e., EVA 1 vs. EVA 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Risk of accidents in connection with emergency driving (i.e., authorized driving in response to emergencies) have been more or less proportional to the increase of traffic and traffic density (Wilbur, 1997; Burke et al, 2001; Lundälv et al, 2010). Emergency driving is further complicated by traffic intensity, which varies considerably depending on the site of the accident, where the emergency vehicle is in relation to the accident site and because on actions taken by other road users, such as their reactions as they notice the warning lights and sirens (Vägverket, 2008). To avoid risk of simulator sickness, the participant was told to start by driving no faster than 30 kph and to look straight ahead for the first minute, and accelerate to the speed limit of 80 kph. An ambulance under an emergency call, with blue lights and sirens engaged, caught up with and passed the participant’s car at about 3,250 m from the start of the scenario (including the 1-min acclimatization to the simulator). The participant was told to stop after the ambulance had taken over and increased its distance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call