Abstract
IntroductionThe unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory. A simple theoretical model of the UEG was previously proposed and tested in silico.Method and resultsThe aim of this study was to use epicardial sock‐mapping data to validate the simple model's predictions of unipolar electrogram morphology in the in vivo human heart. The simple model conceptualizes the UEG as the difference between a local cardiac action potential and a position‐independent component representing remote activity, which is defined as the average of all action potentials. UEGs were recorded in 18 patients using a multielectrode sock containing 240 electrodes and activation (AT) and repolarization time (RT) were measured using standard definitions. For each cardiac site, a simulated local action potential was generated by adjusting a stylized action potential to fit AT and RT measured in vivo. The correlation coefficient (cc) measuring the morphological similarity between 13,637 recorded and simulated UEGs was cc = 0.89 (0.72–0.95), median (Q1–Q3), for the entire UEG, cc = 0.90 (0.76–0.95) for QRS complexes, and cc = 0.83 (0.58–0.92) for T‐waves. QRS and T‐wave areas from recorded and simulated UEGs showed cc> 0.89 and cc> 0.84, respectively, indicating good agreement between voltage isochrones maps. Simulated UEGs accurately reproduced the interaction between AT and QRS morphology and between RT and T‐wave morphology observed in vivo.ConclusionsHuman in vivo whole heart data support the validity of the simple model, which provides a framework for improving the understanding of the UEG and its clinical utility.
Highlights
The unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory
We aim to provide unique human in vivo data to formally validate the simple model and demonstrate its validity as a useful tool to relate the morphology of the signals recorded in the catheter lab to cardiac activation-repolarization dynamics
The simple model described in this article and first proposed by Potse et al.[7] explains the morphology of the UEG as the difference between the local action potential (AP) and a position-independent remote component, which is equal to the mean AP
Summary
The unipolar electrogram (UEG) provides local measures of cardiac activation and repolarization and is an important translational link between patient and laboratory. The UEG is widely used in electrophysiological research and in the catheter lab since it allows simultaneous multisite assessment of fundamental parameters such as local activation (AT) and repolarization times (RT) as well as action potential duration, tissue viability, and focal sources.[1,4,5,6] current advanced mapping systems and higher density mapping electrode configurations are increasingly being utilized to provide unipolar data. Potse et al.[7] have proposed a simple model that conceptualizes the UEG as the rescaled difference between a local cardiac action potential (AP) and a position-independent component representing remote activity. This simple model was derived from a realistic multiscale 3D bidomain model, one of the most widely
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have