Abstract
High-frame-rate (HFR) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) assesses myocardial function by quantifying motion and deformation at high temporal resolution. Among the proposed HFR techniques, multiline transmission (MLT) and diverging wave (DW) imaging have been used in this context both being characterized by specific advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, in this article, we directly contrast both approaches in an in vivo setting while operating at the same frame rate (FR). First, images were recorded at baseline (resting condition) from healthy volunteers and patients. Next, additional acquisitions during stress echocardiography were performed on volunteers. Each scan was contoured and processed by a previously proposed 2-D HFR STE algorithm based on cross correlation. Then, strain curves and their end-systolic (ES) values were extracted for all myocardial segments for further statistical analysis. The baseline acquisitions did not reveal differences in estimated strain between the acquisition modes ( ); myocardial segments ( ); or an interaction between imaging mode and depth ( ). Similarly, during stress testing, no difference ( p = 0.7 ) was observed for the two scan sequences, stress levels or an interaction sequence-stress level ( p = 0.94 ). Overall, our findings show that MLT and DW compoundings give comparable HFR STE strain values and that the choice for using one method or the other may thus rather be based on other factors, for example, system requirements or computational cost.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call