Abstract
This study aimed to compare the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with that of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V) for measurement of the vascular diameter on computed tomography (CT) angiography model. We used 6 vascular models of 3 wall thicknesses. We used DLIR, FBP, and ASiR-V for reconstruction, and compared the accuracy and precision of vascular diameter measurement, as well as the image noise, among the 3 reconstruction methods. Image noise was in the order of FBP > ASiR-V > DLIR. The vascular diameters measured using DLIR and ASiR-V were comparable with, or significantly closer to, the actual diameter than those measured using FBP. The precision of the diameter measurement using DLIR was comparable with or significantly superior to that using FBP/ASiR-V. Use of DLIR, as compared with FBP or ASiR-V, for image reconstruction can improve the precision and accuracy of vascular diameter measurement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.