Abstract

Considering the increasing emergence of new contaminants, such as nanomaterials, mixing with legacy contaminants, including metal(loid)s, it becomes imperative to understand the toxic profile resulting from these interactions. This work aimed at assessing and comparing the individual and combined hepatotoxic and neurotoxic potential of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs 0.75–75 mg/L), cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2NPs 0.075–10 μg/L), arsenic (As 0.01–2.5 mg/L), and mercury (Hg 0.5–100 mg/L) on human hepatoma (HepG2) and neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells. Viability was assessed through WST-1 (24 h) and clonogenic (7 days) assays and it was affected in a dose-, time- and cell-dependent manner. Higher concentrations caused greater toxicity, while prolonged exposure caused inhibition of cell proliferation, even at low concentrations, for both cell lines. Cell cycle progression, explored by flow cytometry 24 h post-exposure, revealed that TiO2NPs, As and Hg but not CeO2NPs, changed the profiles of SH-SY5Y and HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and that the cell cycle was, overall, more affected by exposure to mixtures. Exposure to binary mixtures revealed either potentiation or antagonistic effects depending on the composition, cell type and time of exposure. These findings prove that joint toxicity of contaminants cannot be disregarded and must be further explored.

Highlights

  • The dramatic growth of nanoparticles (NPs) production and the benefits they have to offer come with questions regarding the risks related to their exposure [1]

  • A549 lung epithelial cells [41] we showed that As toxicity was reduced upon co-exposure with CeO2 NPs or TiO2 NPs, but the same was not observed with Hg, regardless of the con

  • It should be mentioned that 7 days exposure to TiO2 NPs caused a higher decrease in HepG2 cell survival than SH-SY5Y, indicating an inversion in cell sensitivity observed for 24 h exposure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dramatic growth of nanoparticles (NPs) production and the benefits they have to offer come with questions regarding the risks related to their exposure [1]. NPs are released into the environment, affecting both biotic and abiotic components of the ecosystem and inevitably mix and interact with other contaminants, including metal(loid) and their compounds [2,3]. These interactions raise concerns regarding their general and occupational health and safety profiles. Different NPs have been reported to have outstanding capacity for metals adsorption from aqueous or organic solutions [4–8], among them, cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) and titanium dioxide (TiO2 NPs) nanoparticles. TiO2 NPs are a main component of many household items [11]. CeO2 NPs are present in outdoor air, since most of

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call