Abstract

The reconstruction of large defects after head and neck cancer resection often requires composite tissue transfer to replace a combination of bone, muscle and mucosa. Thus, tissue engineering techniques may be useful for oral mucosal reconstructive surgery to prefabricate mucosal tissue on the muscle flap in vivo, instead of using conventional skin-bearing composite flaps. The aim of this study was to investigate whether autogenous pre-confluent oral keratinocytes (PCOK) cultured in vitro can create mucosal coverage on muscle in vivo, in a single grafting procedure. In 30 Wistar rats, with a small piece of oral mucosa ( 2 mm×5 mm), oral keratinocytes were isolated and then seeded on a hydrophilic PTFE membrane ( n=50) in serum-free culture condition. After 48 h, the membrane, together with the PCOK, was transplanted onto the gracilis muscle to fabricate a mucosal flap in vivo. The wound bed was closed primarily until the time of examination. Biopsies were carried out 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks, respectively, after transplantation and were evaluated immunohistochemically (AE1/AE3 anti-pancytokeratin, cytokeratin 5/6, collagen IV, laminin, lectin-specific labeling of N-acetylglucosamine oligomeres of endothelial cells) with relation to the following criteria: (1) graft acceptance; (2) inflammatory signs; (3) structural changes and keratinocyte lining; (4) expression of basement membrane components; and (5) vascularization. Ninety-one percent of the grafts showed uniform epithelial layers. The mean number of reconstructed epithelial cell layers was 1.7, 2.0, 1.85 and 2.7 at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, respectively after transplantation ( P=0.342). Collagen IV, laminin and lectin-specific capillaries developed between the neoepithelium and the underlying muscular layer. Only two specimens showed signs of infection 2 weeks after transplantation. In conclusion, this experiment demonstrated that PCOK grafts on muscle in vivo can achieve uniform multi-layered oral epithelial coverage in a short period of time. This technique may be a useful alternative tool for oropharyngeal reconstructive surgery and is also worth considering for further clinical studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call