Abstract
The objective of this paper is to showcase to an engineer who is considering performing a diagnostic cyclic load test a theoretical procedure for determining the patch load, which when applied to a two-way reinforced concrete (RC) slab floor system would generate internal forces at critical locations equal to those resulting from the uniformly distributed load. This procedure should also help the practitioner to define a representative model of the structure and to update the magnitude of the target load at the end of each loading and unloading cycle by means of a real-time evaluation of boundary conditions and slab stiffness. The routine to design a cyclic load test is described theoretically first and then validated with the results of a load test on a concrete two-way RC slab floor system. Introduction The current role of testing within structural engineering has gained increasing importance, as it can now be applied to every phase of the structure’s life because of innovative materials and new design approaches. By focusing on either the preliminary testing of a new structure or the necessary control checks prior to assessing the strength of an existing one, in-situ load testing can determine the real behavior of the structure under the existing loading conditions. Accordingly, researchers can have an overall, accurate understanding of the mechanical properties of the structural members. In the United States of America, the current American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318 Building Code [1] provides requirements for load testing of concrete structures. ACI Committee 437 [2] proposes a diagnostic cyclic load (DCL) testing procedure consisting of the application of patch loads in a quasi-static way to the structural member according to loading and unloading cycles. Patch load magnitude and distribution shall simulate the uniformly distributed load defined in the ACI 318 Building Code. The DCL protocol [3,4] defines three acceptance criteria that can be easily computed, in real time, for any structural member by simply checking its behavior under the test load (see Fig. 1 for necessary notation). Repeatability and Permanency represent the behavior of the structure during two identical load cycles; Deviation from linearity represents the measure of the nonlinear behavior of a member being tested. Repeatability = 100 95 B B max r A B max r % % Δ − Δ × ≥ Δ − Δ ; (1) Permanency = 100 10 B r B max % % Δ × ≤ Δ ; (2)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.