Abstract

The province of Groningen in the Netherlands is experiencing the continuous impact of gas extraction in the form of induced seismicity. Due to the absence of naturally occurring seismicity in the region, the historic building stock of Groningen was constructed without empirical design features typically encountered in naturally seismic regions. Further, gas extraction, in combination with soft topsoil, is responsible for substantial amounts of ground subsidence. This subsidence may compromise the capacity of existing structures to bear seismic loading.Historic masonry structures, particularly those lacking traditional earthquake-resistant features, are vulnerable to seismic loads. Further, their substantial weight, in-plane stiffness, low tensile strength and brittleness renders them vulnerable to settlement-induced damage. Given the cultural significance of architectural heritage, the performance of historic buildings in the Damage Limitation (DL) state is a matter of importance. Additionally, due to the incorporation of both vernacular and monumental architectural heritage buildings in the urban setting, their performance in the Near Collapse (NC) state is as important as that of ordinary building structures. Therefore, methods and techniques for enhancing the behaviour of historic buildings in both States need to be devised and evaluated.This paper focuses on the application and assessment of a retrofitting technique commonly used for damage prevention and repair in unreinforced masonry structures in the Netherlands, namely bed joint reinforced repointing. The technique consists in the embedment of stainless-steel bars in continuous bed joints, as well as their dry placement across cracks in the masonry. The technique is applied on a masonry wall tested under quasi-static cyclic in-plane shear loading for the evaluation of its performance not only in the DL state for which it was conceived, but also in the NC states. The wall features artificially introduced cracks that simulate settlement-induced damage prior to the installation of the bars.A finite element meso-model is used for the simulation of the wall tests, featuring the artificial damage and reinforcement elements. The model is used in non-linear cyclic analyses for the simulation of the experiments.Through experimental testing and numerical modelling, the efficiency of the strengthening technique is evaluated in terms of resulting shifts in wall capacity, stiffness and failure mode. Further comments are provided concerning its applicability and structural compatibility.

Highlights

  • This paper focuses on the application and assessment of a retrofitting technique commonly used for damage prevention and repair in unreinforced masonry structures in the Netherlands, namely bed joint reinforced repointing

  • The main objective of the experimental campaign is the assessment of bed joint reinforced repointing used in brick masonry walls

  • A strengthening technique consisting in bed joint reinforced repointing and the placement of diagonal anchors has been investigated

Read more

Summary

State of the art

The link between gas extraction and induced seismicity has been clearly established over the last decades [1]. The Dutch province of Groningen is characterized by the coincidence of several features: a) extensive gas extraction operations, b) soft sop-soil, c) historic lack of seismic activity and d) a preponderance of historic masonry structures The combination of these features has resulted in wide-spread damage to existing structures in the region, the vast majority of which appears to be linked to in-plane effects [13]. A high strength mortar is used for the repointing, providing high strength and stiffness and an excellent bond with the reinforcement bars This intervention technique, while having seen widespread use over several decades, has not been the subject of rigorous experimental and numerical investigation, especially at the structural scale. The potential of this technique for enhancing the in-plane performance of retrofitted masonry walls, dealing with both major structural issues faced in Groningen at once, is a further motivating factor for its investigation and improvement

Objectives and methodology
Experimental campaign
Companion material tests
Masonry walls
Comparison of unstrengthened and strengthened walls
Assessment of the strengthening method
Numerical modelling strategy
Analysis results
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call