Abstract
The rhetoric of nomadism used by Tomas Segovia (Spain, 1927-Mexico, 2011) renders his exilic poetry suggestively paradoxical: the poetic “I” aims to become exiled from exile. Segovia saw himself as marginal and without a homeland long before the exile brought about by the Spanish Civil War. He arrived in Mexico in 1940, and from 1976 until his death, lived between Spain and Mexico. He is considered a prominent representative of the Spanish Republican exile on both sides of the Atlantic, a characterization that the writer rejected. In light of the sociohistorical circumstances that defined the Spanish Republican exile in Mexico, this essay interrogates the ethico-political sense in which the condition of exile can be read in Segovia’s poetry. Thus it critiques the sometimes reductive contextual reading favored within political institutions. Drawing on Kwame Anthony Appiah’s definition of cosmopolitan ethics as an ethics that addresses the challenge of harmonizing universality and particularity, I read Segovia’s poetry as pointing toward a universal horizon that derives from a difference that Segovia could not entirely shed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.