Abstract

The information asymmetry of market players leads to product safety becoming a regulatory issue. From the perspective of law and economics, the consumer principle requires manufacturers to balance investment in product safety with consumer insurance benefits. The producer principle requires producers to face the conflict between product safety improvements and product innovation and to balance the two. Product liability under Chinese law tends to favour the former. Singh's economic analysis model of effective product liability rules (2001) demonstrates the relative superiority of strict liability, but it is not perfect. It is hoped that, by analysis from the perspective of law and economics, the legal regime relating to product liability in China will move towards effective improvements that balance the interests of the individual and those of society.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call