Abstract

Despite reported findings, explanations for within-species variation in behavioural performance on cognitive tests are still understudied. Cognitive processes are influenced by environmental and genetic differences, where cognitive stimulation and monoaminergic systems are predicted to be important. To explore explanations for individual variation in impulsivity (a behaviour that is negatively correlated with inhibitory control), we experimentally altered the environment of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus , by exposing chicks from newly hatched to 9 weeks old to either (1) both environmental and cognitive enrichment, (2) environmental enrichment without additional cognitive enrichment or (3) neither environmental nor cognitive enrichment. Subsequently, we measured variation in impulsivity and brain gene expression of genes from the dopaminergic system ( DRD1 and DRD2 ) and serotonergic system ( 5HT2A, 5HT1B, 5HT2B, 5HT2C and TPH ). We focused on two aspects of impulsivity, impulsive action and persistence, and their reduction over time. Cognitively enriched chicks tended to have higher initial impulsive action and had higher initial persistence, and our environmentally enriched chicks had slower reduction of impulsive action over time. DRD2 (a dopamine receptor gene) had lower expression in environmentally enriched chicks. Variation in impulsive action tended to correlate with expression of TPH (a gene involved in serotonin synthesis), whereas persistence correlated with both TPH and the dopamine receptor gene DRD1 , and tended to correlate with the dopaminergic gene DRD2 , regardless of rearing treatment. These results indicate that both environment and links to neurobiology could explain initial individual variation in, and reduction of, impulsivity. Further, distinct neurobiological pathways appear to govern impulsive action versus persistence, supporting the suggestion that impulsivity is a heterogenic behaviour. • We studied effects of experimentally altered rearing experiences on impulsivity. • We measured two aspects of impulsivity: impulsive action and persistence. • Cognitive enrichment affected impulsivity and rate of inhibiting impulsivity. • Brain monoaminergic gene expression linked to both aspects of impulsivity. • Thus, both environment and neurobiology contribute to variation in impulsivity.

Highlights

  • Despite reported findings, explanations for within-species variation in behavioural performance on cognitive tests are still understudied

  • To explore explanations for individual variation in impulsivity, we experimentally altered the environment of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, by exposing chicks from newly hatched to 9 weeks old to either (1) both environmental and cognitive enrichment, (2) environmental enrichment without additional cognitive enrichment or (3) neither environmental nor cognitive enrichment

  • We investigated whether red junglefowl chicks showed individual differences in impulsive action and persistence, whether these differences were repeatable, and whether impulsivity and its change over time were influenced by rearing, in terms of enrichment received or monoaminergic gene expression

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Explanations for within-species variation in behavioural performance on cognitive tests are still understudied. The current lack of explanations for within-species variation in impulsivity may be because impulsivity appears to consist of multiple different aspects in both humans (Evenden, 1999) and other animals (Brucks et al, 2017; Nautiyal, Wall, et al, 2017) These aspects include impulsive action (in which more impulsive individuals are less able to inhibit a motor response; Broos et al, 2012; Diamond & Gilbert, 1989; Winstanley et al, 2006) and persistence (in which more impulsive individuals are more likely to continue to use a previously adaptive response after it ceases to be adaptive; Schippers et al, 2017; Winstanley et al, 2006). Studies are needed that use different treatments, in which individuals are reared in different conditions, designed to separate cognitive enrichment from more general environmental enrichment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call