Abstract

Abstract. Assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture data (SM-DA) to correct soil water stores of rainfall-runoff models has shown skill in improving streamflow prediction. In the case of large and sparsely monitored catchments, SM-DA is a particularly attractive tool. Within this context, we assimilate satellite soil moisture (SM) retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E), the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) and the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) instrument, using an Ensemble Kalman filter to improve operational flood prediction within a large (> 40 000 km2) semi-arid catchment in Australia. We assess the importance of accounting for channel routing and the spatial distribution of forcing data by applying SM-DA to a lumped and a semi-distributed scheme of the probability distributed model (PDM). Our scheme also accounts for model error representation by explicitly correcting bias in soil moisture and streamflow in the ensemble generation process, and for seasonal biases and errors in the satellite data. Before assimilation, the semi-distributed model provided a more accurate streamflow prediction (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, NSE = 0.77) than the lumped model (NSE = 0.67) at the catchment outlet. However, this did not ensure good performance at the "ungauged" inner catchments (two of them with NSE below 0.3). After SM-DA, the streamflow ensemble prediction at the outlet was improved in both the lumped and the semi-distributed schemes: the root mean square error of the ensemble was reduced by 22 and 24%, respectively; the false alarm ratio was reduced by 9% in both cases; the peak volume error was reduced by 58 and 1%, respectively; the ensemble skill was improved (evidenced by 12 and 13% reductions in the continuous ranked probability scores, respectively); and the ensemble reliability was increased in both cases (expressed by flatter rank histograms). SM-DA did not improve NSE. Our findings imply that even when rainfall is the main driver of flooding in semi-arid catchments, adequately processed satellite SM can be used to reduce errors in the model soil moisture, which in turn provides better streamflow ensemble prediction. We demonstrate that SM-DA efficacy is enhanced when the spatial distribution in forcing data and routing processes are accounted for. At ungauged locations, SM-DA is effective at improving some characteristics of the streamflow ensemble prediction; however, the updated prediction is still poor since SM-DA does not address the systematic errors found in the model prior to assimilation.

Highlights

  • Floods have large costs to society, causing destruction of infrastructure and crops, erosion, and in the worst cases, injury and loss of life (Thielen et al, 2009)

  • In this study we used a maximum a posteriori (MAP) scheme, a Bayesian inference procedure detailed by Wang et al (2009) that maximises the probability of observing historical events given the model and error parameters

  • After analysing the temporal variability of the observation errors using the complete period of record, we found that a 4-month sampling window can reproduce seasonality in errors while ensuring sufficient data samples for the triple collocation (TC) and lagged variables (LV) schemes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floods have large costs to society, causing destruction of infrastructure and crops, erosion, and in the worst cases, injury and loss of life (Thielen et al, 2009). To understand and assess this skill, further studies focusing on the improvement of streamflow prediction are needed with different model characteristics, such as structure, parametrisation and performance before assimilation; and with different catchment characteristics, such as climate, scale, soils, geology, land cover and density of monitoring network. Among the latter, semi-arid catchments present distinct rainfall-runoff processes which have been rarely studied in SM-DA.

Study area and data
Lumped and semi-distributed model schemes
EnKF formulation
Error model representation
Error model parameters calibration
Profile soil moisture estimation
Rescaling and observation error estimation
Evaluation metrics
Model calibration
Error model parameters and ensemble prediction
Satellite soil moisture data assimilation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call