Abstract
FPGAs have been shown to operate reliably within harsh radiation environments by employing single-event upset (SEU) mitigation techniques, such as configuration scrubbing, triple-modular redundancy, error correction coding, and radiation aware implementation techniques. The effectiveness of these techniques, however, is limited when using complex system-level designs that employ complex I/O interfaces with single-point failures. In previous work, a complex SoC system running Linux applied several of these techniques only to obtain an improvement of 14 \(\times\) in mean time to failure (MTTF). A detailed post-radiation fault analysis found that the limitations in reliability were due to the DDR interface, the global clock network, and interconnect. This article applied a number of design-specific SEU mitigation techniques to address the limitations in reliability of this design. These changes include triplicating the global clock, optimizing the placement of the reduction output voters and input flip-flops, and employing a mapping technique called “striping.” The application of these techniques improved MTTF of the mitigated design by a factor of 1.54 \(\times\) and thus provides a 22.8X \(\times\) MTTF improvement over the unmitigated design. A post-radiation fault analysis using BFAT was also performed to find the remaining design vulnerabilities.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
