Abstract
To identify factors that affect the likelihood of follow-up after emergency department (ED) visit for ophthalmic complaints and to evaluate a protocol to improve compliance. Prospective interventional study with historical controls. This study was conducted at Jamaica Hospital Medical Center in Jamaica, New York. The study population included 962 patients who presented to the ED and who required ophthalmology consultation. Participants in the control group were given only verbal follow-up instructions. Participants in the intervention group were given verbal instructions, written instructions, telephone calls, and, if not responding to calls, a mailed letter. The primary outcome was the overall follow-up rate. Secondary outcomes were follow-up rate by demographic subgroup. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to follow up (68.8% vs 42.9%, P < .001). Nearly all subgroups exhibited significantly improved follow-up with the intervention, with the exception of patients 18 to 29 years of age, patients with diagnosis severity class III, patients with no insurance, patients with hospital financial aid, patients paying with workers' compensation, and patients with an unknown employment status. Before the intervention, most patients receiving ophthalmology consultation in the ED did not return for follow-up care. These patients tended to be young, unemployed, uninsured or use hospital financial aid, were in the control group, had good visual acuity, reported no change in vision, and had a condition that was not vision-threatening. Follow-up rates were improved in nearly all subgroups by providing written instructions, telephone calls, and mailed letters. Such instructions should be considered in similar populations.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have