Abstract
Surface hydrophobicity and grease resistance of paper may be achieved by the application of coatings usually derived from fossil-oil resources. However, poor recyclability and environmental concerns on generated waste has increased interest in the study of alternative paper coatings. This work focuses on the study of the performances offered by two different biopolymers, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and polycaprolactone (PCL), also assessing the effect of a plasticizer (PEG) when used as paper coatings. The coated samples were characterized for the structural (by scanning electron microscopy, SEM), diffusive (water vapor and grease barrier properties), and surface properties (affinity for water and oil, by contact angle measurements). Samples of polyethylene-coated and fluorinated paper were used as commercial reference. WVTR of coated samples generally decreased and PHBV and PCL coatings with PEG at 20% showed interesting low wettability, as inferred from the water contact angles. Samples coated with PCL also showed increased grease resistance in comparison with plain paper. This work, within the limits of its lab-scale, offers interesting insights for future research lines toward the development of cellulose-based food contact materials that are fully recyclable and compostable.
Highlights
Paper is a light, flexible, biodegradable, highly recyclable and compostable material, derived from renewable resources and its appreciable environmental compatibility often confirms it as the first choice by several food industries, both as primary and secondary packaging [1,2,3]
Concerns related to the impact of plastic materials and fluorinated compounds on the ecosystem and on human health have urged the search for alternative solutions
Research on the development of bioplastics, suitable both as stand-alone film and as paper coatings, has moved forward: these materials may offer interesting functionalities contributing to the food products protection and shelf life extension and to sustainability [6]
Summary
Flexible, biodegradable, highly recyclable and compostable material, derived from renewable resources and its appreciable environmental compatibility often confirms it as the first choice by several food industries, both as primary and secondary packaging [1,2,3]. In the case of polyethylene coated papers, if the recycling of such a composite product already requires specialized facilities and systems and additional costs (the plastic layer can break down in flakes which tend to clog the fine screens, and by melting from roller heat, provoke paper breaking, meaning downtimes and production losses), further issues are encountered at the time when food solid residues could remain anchored to the packaging: food residues can bypass filtration and fiber separation systems This means they can interfere, by contamination, with paper sheet formation, or increase the organic load that treatment systems have to handle (mechanical, physical, biological or physicochemical wastewater treatment). In 2021, the ASTM D6868 standard [8] was revised and updated and it defines the requirements for labeling of materials and products (packaging included), entirely designed to be composted in municipal and industrial aerobic composting facilities, wherein a biodegradable plastic film or coating is attached, either through lamination or extrusion directly onto the paper, to compostable substrates. A satisfactorily compostable product must demonstrate proper disintegration during composting, adequate level of inherent biodegradation, and no adverse impacts on the ability of composts to support plant growth
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
