Abstract
Because of the reliance on the empirical parameter CASE damping coefficient Jc, the high‐strain CASE method is not recommended. The automatic bearing capacity calculation method RAU can avoid this, but it cannot be applied to friction piles. Based on the analysis of the automatic calculation method of bearing capacity RAU, considering the influence of pile side soil resistance unloading, this paper improved the RAU method through the influence of pile side soil damping on the velocity of the pile mass point during the stress wave propagation process. In this paper, we compare the collected static load test results of test piles with the improved automatic method results. The unary linear regression analysis is carried out with the help of statistical tools. The unary linear regression of the improved automatic method bearing capacity results on the static load test bearing capacity results is established. The improved automatic method solves the problem that the RAU method is only applicable to end‐bearing piles and can be applied to the quality analysis and bearing capacity calculation of the high‐strain curve of the driven pile.
Highlights
Advances in Civil Engineering nonlinear problems, but the analysis requires high-quality software and highly skilled personnel. erefore, more time is required on the machine for analysis and generally can only be completed when the test is completed and returned to the room
The fitting method cannot be used to determine whether there is any problem in the process of driving piles by monitoring the process of driving piles, and it is not easy to estimate the bearing capacity quickly at the project site. erefore, the CASE method is difficult to be completely replaced by a fitting method
Fellenius et al [32, 33] concluded that the Jc value of the CASE method is related to the type of pile, the test site, and the pile driving resistance through a dynamic and static comparison of four prefabricated steel piles in moraine soil
Summary
Considering the pile as a one-dimensional continuous elastic bar, its vibration equation is z2u zt2 −. E static resistance of the soil to the pile has nothing to do with the displacement between the pile and soil but is only related to the existence of the relative displacement between the pile and soil Based on these three basic assumptions, the CASE calculation expression of the ultimate bearing capacity was derived using the travelling wave theory and wave equations to derive:. E ultimate bearing capacity is the ultimate bearing capacity of the pile when velocity in (3) is equal to zero, and the influence of Jc will disappear completely It is apparently only when the pile is completely moved, the soil resistance at the side of the pile has little effect, the resistance of the soil does not decrease significantly, and the unloading of the soil at the side of the pile is not obvious that this value is suitable. In the upper and lower wave superimposed area of the pile body, due to the late unloading, the speed is slow, and there is still a certain lateral resistance. at is to say, the pile side soil resistance assumed by the RAU method can only be maintained near the pile tip, and the residual total resistance of the upper soil layer can be ignored due to unloading. erefore, the soil resistance obtained by the RAU method is almost only the static soil resistance near the pile end, so we can use the static soil resistance on the upper side of the pile to modify the RAU method
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.