Abstract
AbstractHere, the results of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulation are calibrated and validated using SWAT-CUP Premium, and the R2 (coefficient of determination) values of simulated and observed flows are compared. According to the SWAT analysis of the Cheongsong Yongjeon stream basin, low accuracy of 0.40 was the R2 value for simulated and observed flows, and the baseflow was calculated at an annual average of 46.659 m3/s. During the same period, after calibration and validation using SWAT-CUP Premium, the R2 value of simulated and observed flows was improved to 0.71, and the evaluation indexes showed 0.51 for Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NS), 37.1 for percent bias (PBIAS), 0.73 for P-factor, and 0.33 for R-factor, indicating that the relationship between observed and simulated flows was improved. In addition, after calibration and validation, the baseflow was 56.951 m3/s, which was a more accurate value than the one before calibration and validation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
