Abstract
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is frequently used to analyze urinary proteins, but appropriate urine sample preparation is essential, because urinary proteins are present in small concentrations, and urine contains high concentrations of salts and metabolic wastes. The aim of this study was to determine the optimum method for urine sample preparation. The effects on urinary protein recovery of pretreating the ultrafiltration apparatus with various agents (Triton X-100, Tween20, PEG compound, and SDS) were studied; Triton X-100 was found to be the most effective agent. Ultrafiltration and acetone precipitation were compared as sample preparation methods for SDS-PAGE. Recovery of urinary protein using ultrafiltration (89.5 ± 8.1%) was better than that achieved by using acetone precipitation (75.1 ± 12.2%) (p < 0.01). Integrated densitometric values for five protein bands (62, 52, 39, 31, and 6 kDa) were higher for ultrafiltration samples than for acetone samples (42350 ± 2568 vs. 37010 ± 725, 34665 ± 1519 vs. 32355 ± 2278, 10755 ± 1683 vs. 8870 ± 941, 65920 ± 3354 vs. 60680 ± 3651, and 1355 ± 160 vs. 1130 ± 211, respectively) (p < 0.05), although differences for the other nine bands were not significant. In conclusion, ultrafiltration is a suitable method for preparing urine samples for SDS-PAGE.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
