Abstract
AbstractA comparison is made between air and carbon dioxide as secondary cooling gases in cold on‐column injection into capillary columns. Because CO2 is a more effective coolant than air, the injection zone can be kept at a colder temperature, thus preventing loss of sample vapor through the open injector even as the initial oven temperatures because greater than the boiling point of the solvent. Sample loss at these elevated temperatures is shown as a reduction in peak area as functions of column temperature during injection and different injection zone temperatures. The maximum allowable oven temperature during injection is significantly higher when CO2 is used as secondary coolant rather than air.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
