Abstract

Agricultural production relies to a great ex- tent on biological processes in natural environments. In ad- dition to volatile prices, it is thus heavily exposed to risks caused by the variability of natural conditions such as rain- fall, temperature and pests. With a view to the apparently lacking support of risky farm production program decisions through formal planning models, the objective of this paper is to examine whether, and eventually by how much, farm- ers' intuitive program decisions can be improved through formal statistical analyses and stochastic optimization mod- els. In this performance comparison, we use the results of the formal planning approach that are generated in a quasi ex-ante analysis as a normative benchmark for the empiri- cally observed ones. To avoid benchmark solutions that would possibly exceed the respective farmer's risk toler- ance, we limit the formal search to a subset of solutions that are second-degree stochastically dominant compared to the farmer's own decision. We furthermore compare the suit- ability of different statistical (time series) models to forecast the uncertainty of single gross margins.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call