Improved outcomes of endoscopic treatment for delayed perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms

Abstract

Background and study aim Emergency surgery is usually required in patients with delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, cases of successful endoscopic treatment have been recently reported. Here, we elucidated the usefulness of endoscopic intervention for patients with delayed perforation. Patients and methods Patients who underwent gastric ESD from 2005–2022 were assessed for eligibility. Delayed perforation was defined as no intraprocedural perforation after the ESD but subsequent development of peritoneal irritation and free air on the computed tomography scan. Participants were divided into early- and late-period groups based on the time (October 2015) of implementation of the polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet and the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in clinical practice. We evaluated the changes in the incidence of required surgery. Results Among the 5,048 patients who underwent gastric ESD, delayed perforation occurred in 28 patients (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4%–0.8%). The incidence of delayed perforation did not differ significantly between the early- and late-period groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%). The proportion of patients who underwent surgery was significantly smaller in the late-period group than in the early-period group (54% vs. 13%, odds ratio: 0.14 [95% CI: 0.02–0.83], p = 0.042); this was confirmed by multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio: 0.04 [95% CI: 0.002–0.9, p = 0.043) after adjustment for age, sex, Charlson’s comorbidity index, tumor location, and size. Conclusions Endoscopic intervention using PGA sheets and OTSC was associated with a low incidence of required surgery for delayed perforation after gastric ESD and is recommended.