Abstract

An integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety analysis (IDPSA) was carried out to assess the performances of the firefighting means to be applied in a nuclear power plant. The tools used in the analysis are the code FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator) for fire simulation and the tool MCDET (Monte Carlo Dynamic Event Tree) for handling epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. The combination of both tools allowed for an improved modelling of a fire interacting with firefighting means while epistemic uncertainties because lack of knowledge and aleatory uncertainties due to the stochastic aspects of the performances of the firefighting means are simultaneously taken into account. The MCDET-FDS simulations provided a huge spectrum of fire sequences each associated with a conditional occurrence probability at each point in time. These results were used to derive probabilities of damage states based on failure criteria considering high temperatures of safety related targets and critical exposure times. The influence of epistemic uncertainties on the resulting probabilities was quantified. The paper describes the steps of the IDPSA and presents a selection of results. Focus is laid on the consideration of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. Insights and lessons learned from the analysis are discussed.

Highlights

  • integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety analysis (IDPSA)—frequently called Dynamic PSA—can be regarded as a complementary analysis to the classical deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic (PSA) safety analyses [1, 2]

  • Since MCDET can in principal be coupled to any deterministic dynamics code, the open source and freely available code FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator) from NIST [6] was selected to be applied for fire simulation

  • What makes MCDET useful for a fire safety analysis is its Crew Module which allows for considering human actions such as those applied for firefighting as a time-dependent process [7, 8] which can interact with the process modelled by any dynamics code chosen to be combined with MCDET such as FDS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

IDPSA—frequently called Dynamic PSA—can be regarded as a complementary analysis to the classical deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic (PSA) safety analyses [1, 2] It makes extensive use of a deterministic dynamics code and applies advanced methods for an improved modeling and probabilistic assessment of complex systems with significant interactions between a process, hardware, software, firmware, and human actions [3]. What makes MCDET useful for a fire safety analysis is its Crew Module which allows for considering human actions such as those applied for firefighting as a time-dependent process [7, 8] which can interact with the process modelled by any dynamics code chosen to be combined with MCDET such as FDS

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call